インベスコの視点

Tactical Asset Allocation: December 2022

Tactical Asset Allocation December 2022
Moving to a recovery regime. Overweighting risk relative to benchmark, via equities, risky credit, emerging markets, and cyclical factors.

 

Synopsis
  • Our macro framework moves to a recovery regime, as improving risk appetite signals improving growth expectations in the near term. This is unlikely to represent the start of a new cycle but presents nonetheless an opportunity to tactically increase portfolio risk.
  • We overweight portfolio risk in the Global Tactical Asset Allocation model1, moving from underweight to overweight equities relative to fixed income, favoring emerging markets, value, smaller capitalizations, and cyclical sectors. Overweight risky credit, neutral duration and underweight the US dollar.

 

Macro update

Risk appetite improved meaningfully over the past month, led by broad based and consistent outperformance in equities relative to fixed income, outperformance in emerging markets relative to developed markets, and tightening in credit spreads across most fixed income sectors. The magnitude of this turnaround in market sentiment has historically signaled improving growth expectations and a subsequent improvement in economic indicators, as evidenced by the strong positive correlation – approximately 78% with a lead of 3-months - between our global risk appetite and the leading indicator of the global business cycle. As a result, our framework moves into a recovery regime for the global economy and its major regions (Figure 1 and Figure 2), driven by improving market sentiment and global cyclical indicators below their long-term trend.
 

Figure 1a: Macro framework points to a contraction in the global economy
Figure 1a: Macro framework points to a contraction in the global economy

Consumer confidence surveys are rebounding from recessionary lows, while manufacturing activity has stabilized around trend growth.
Business surveys, housing and international trade indicators continue to decline.
Figure 1b: The global economy is holding up, with marginal improvements in developed markets.
Figure 1b: The global economy is holding up, with marginal improvements in developed markets.

Sources: Bloomberg L.P., Macrobond. Invesco Investment Solutions research and calculations. Proprietary leading economic indicators of Invesco Investment Solutions. Macro regime data as of Nov. 30, 2022. The Leading Economic Indicators (LEIs) are proprietary, forward-looking measures of the level of economic growth. The Global Risk Appetite Cycle Indicator (GRACI) is a proprietary measure of the markets’ risk sentiment.


The magnitude of this turnaround in market sentiment has historically signaled improving growth expectations and a subsequent improvement in economic indicators, as evidenced by the strong positive correlation – approximately 78% with a lead of 3-months – between our global risk appetite and the leading indicator of the global business cycle.
Figure 2: Market sentiment signals improving growth expectations in the near term.
Figure 2: Market sentiment signals improving growth expectations in the near term.

Sources: Bloomberg L.P., MSCI, FTSE, Barclays, JPMorgan, Invesco Investment Solutions research and calculations, from Jan. 1, 1992 to Nov. 30, 2022. The Global Leading Economic Indicator (LEI) is a proprietary, forward-looking measure of the growth level in the economy. A reading above (below) 100 on the Global LEI signals growth above (below) a long-term average. The Global Risk Appetite Cycle Indicator (GRACI) is a proprietary measure of the markets’ risk sentiment. A reading above (below) zero signals a positive (negative) compensation for risk taking in global capital markets in the recent past. Past performance does not guarantee future results.


What were the primary drivers of this rebound in market sentiment?
  • The US October inflation report, released in November, showed a noticeable decline in the monthly core inflation rate, going from 0.6% to 0.4%, providing the market with the long-awaited sign for a future decline in the yearly inflation rate. The size of the market reaction seemed more significant (>+5% in global equities) than the size of the economic surprise, evidence of the critical importance of inflation for the near term path of monetary policy and financial markets.
  • On November 30th, Federal Reserve Chair Powell signaled the Fed will downshift from their rapid pace of tightening as soon as this month, likely raising interest rates by 50bps, following four straight 75bps increases. While the Fed is still projected to raise rates to about 5%, the market is responding favorably to the potential end in the tightening cycle in Q2 2023, likely to be signaled by Fed officials in Q1 2023.

 

Is this recovery likely to signal the beginning of a new economic cycle?

We don’t think so. The rebound in market sentiment and stabilization in economic activity are a reminder of the long and variable lags – typically 1-2 years - by which monetary policy affects the economy. Within these long lags, markets still experience important cyclical fluctuations rather than a straight path towards a recession. We interpret this recovery regime as a positive repricing of recession risks in terms of timing, duration, or magnitude. However, the rapid and meaningful inversion in the yield curve, at about -70bps on both the 2-year vs 10-year and the 3-month vs 10-year, is a reminder of the Fed’s stated goal to keep monetary policy in restrictive territory for a long period of time, until inflation has converged back to 2%.

Despite high uncertainty, low growth and elevated recession probabilities, global economic data have held up relatively well. After several months of steady deceleration, our regional leading indicators suggest economic activity has improved in the Eurozone and United Kingdom and stabilized in the United States. Consumer confidence surveys are rebounding from recessionary lows, while manufacturing activity has stabilized around trend growth. Business surveys, housing and international trade indicators continue to decline. Overall, we believe this macro picture is still indicative of a low growth environment, but also pointing towards stability and declining recession risks in the near term, aided by a favorable combination of slowing inflation (Figure 3) and resilient labor markets.
 

The US October inflation report, released in November, showed a noticeable decline in the monthly core inflation rate, going from 0.6% to 0.4%, providing the market with the long-awaited sign for a future decline in the yearly inflation rate.
Figure 3

Sources: Bloomberg L.P. data as of Nov. 30, 2022, Invesco Investment Solutions calculations. The US Inflation Momentum Indicator (IMI) measures the change in inflation statistics on a trailing three-month basis, covering indicators across consumer and producer prices, inflation expectation surveys, import prices, wages, and energy prices. A positive (negative) reading indicates inflation has been rising (falling) on average over the past three months.

Investment positioning

In this environment, a responsive and adaptive approach to changing macro conditions is required, seeking to harvest return opportunities or mitigate unwanted risks. With our framework transitioning from a contraction to a recovery regime, we increased risk in the Global Tactical Allocation Model and moved to an overweight risk stance relative to benchmark. We move from underweight to overweight equities relative to fixed income, tilting in favor of emerging markets, cyclical sectors, and factors (value, small/midcaps). We are overweight credit risk via lower quality sectors, and neutral on duration. We further reduce exposure to the US dollar and move to an overweight foreign currency stance (Figure 5, 6, 7, 8). In particular:

  • Within equities we overweight cyclical factors with high operating leverage such as value and (small) size, while we underweight defensive factors as low volatility and quality. We underweight momentum as inflection points in the market cycle tend to generate reversal effects between recent winners and losers. Similarly, we favor exposures to cyclical sectors such as financials, industrials, materials, and energy at the expense of health care, staples, utilities, and technology. From a regional perspective, we overweight emerging markets and developed ex-US equities, supported by improving risk appetite, expectations for US dollar depreciation, and early signs of improving economic momentum in Europe.
  • In fixed income we overweight risky credit via high yield, bank loans and emerging markets hard currency debt, given above average spreads and improving risk appetite. In this environment of below trend but improving growth risky credit offers an attractive tactical opportunity for equity-like returns with lower volatility. The exposure is funded from investment grade and government bonds, while we maintain a neutral duration stance relative to benchmark. We expect further modest compression in breakeven inflation expectations, hence favor nominal over inflation-linked bonds.
  • In currency markets we have moved to a max underweight exposure in the US dollar, as global growth is outperforming relative to expectations and recovery regimes are typically accompanied by strong reflationary flows into non-US assets. While yield differentials still support the US dollar relative to foreign currencies, expensive valuations provide headwind to the greenback when safe-haven flows are abating (Figure 4). Within developed markets we favor the euro, the British pound, Norwegian kroner and Swedish krona relative to the Swiss Franc, Japanese yen, Australian and Canadian dollars. In EM we favor high yielders with attractive valuations as the Colombian peso and Brazilian real, relative to low yielding currencies as the Korean won, Taiwan dollar and Chinese renminbi.

 

We have moved to a max underweight exposure in the US dollar, as global growth is outperforming relative to expectations and recovery regimes are typically accompanied by strong reflationary flows into non-US assets.
Figure 4: A long-term peak in the US dollar may be forming
Figure 4: A long-term peak in the US dollar may be forming

Sources: Bloomberg L.P., MSCI, Invesco Investment Solutions research and calculations, from December 1976 to November 30, 2022. US dollar valuations based on relative purchasing power parity against basket of developed market currencies, weighted by their share in the MSCI World ex US index.

Figure 5: Relative tactical asset allocation positioning
Figure 5: Relative tactical asset allocation positioning

Source: Invesco Investment Solutions, Dec. 1, 2022. DM = developed markets. EM = emerging markets. Non-USD FX refers to foreign exchange exposure as represented by the currency composition of the MSCI ACWI Index. For illustrative purposes only.

Figure 6: Tactical factor positioning
Figure 6: Tactical factor positioning

Source: Invesco Investment Solutions, Dec. 1, 2022. For illustrative purposes only. Neutral refers to an equally weighted factor portfolio.

Figure 7: Tactical sector positioning
Figure 7: Tactical sector positioning

Source: Invesco Investment Solutions, Dec. 1, 2022. For illustrative purposes only. Sector allocations derived from factor and style allocations based on proprietary sector classification methodology. As of November 30th, 2022, Cyclicals: energy, financials, industrials, materials; Defensives: consumer staples, health care, information technology, real estate, communication services, utilities; Neutral: consumer discretionary.

Figure 8: Tactical currency positioning
Figure 8: Tactical currency positioning

Source: Invesco Investment Solutions, Dec. 1, 2022. For illustrative purposes only. Currency allocation process considers four drivers of foreign exchange markets: 1) US monetary policy relative to the rest of the world, 2) global growth relative to consensus expectations, 3) currency yields (i.e., carry), 4) currency long-term valuations

Footnotes

  • 1

    Global 60/40 benchmark (60% MSCI ACWI, 40% Bloomberg Global Aggregate USD Hedged).

当資料ご利用上のご注意

当資料は情報提供を目的として、インベスコ・アセット・マネジメント株式会社(以下、「当社」)のグループに属する運用プロフェッショナルが英文で作成したものであり、法令に基づく開示書類でも金融商品取引契約の締結の勧誘資料でもありません。内容には正確を期していますが、必ずしも完全性を当社が保証するものではありません。また、当資料は信頼できる情報に基づいて作成されたものですが、その情報の確実性あるいは完結性を表明するものではありません。当資料に記載されている内容は既に変更されている場合があり、また、予告なく変更される場合があります。当資料には将来の市場の見通し等に関する記述が含まれている場合がありますが、それらは資料作成時における作成者の見解であり、将来の動向や成果を保証するものではありません。また、当資料に示す見解は、インベスコの他の運用チームの見解と異なる場合があります。過去のパフォーマンスや動向は将来の収益や成果を保証するものではありません。当社の事前の承認なく、当資料の一部または全部を使用、複製、転用、配布等することを禁じます。

受託資産の運用に係るリスクについて

受託資産の運用にはリスクが伴い、場合によっては元本に損失が生じる可能性があります。各受託資産へご投資された場合、各受託資産は価格変動を伴う有価証券に投資するため、投資リスク(株価の変動リスク、株価指数先物の価格変動リスク、公社債にかかるリスク、債券先物の価格変動リスク、コモディティにかかるリスク、信用リスク、デフォルト・リスク、流動性リスク、カントリー・リスク、為替変動リスク、中小型株式への投資リスク、デリバティブ.金融派生商品.に関するリスク等)による損失が生じるおそれがあります。ご投資の際には、各受託資産の契約締結前書面、信託約款、商品説明書、目論見書等を必ずご確認下さい。

受託資産の運用に係る費用等について

投資一任契約に関しては、次の事項にご留意ください。【投資一任契約に係る報酬】直接投資の場合の投資一任契約に係る報酬は契約資産額に対して年率0.88%(税込)を上限とする料率を乗じた金額、投資先ファンドを組み入れる場合の投資一任契約に係る報酬は契約資産額に対して年率0.605%(税込)を上限とする料率を乗じた金額が契約期間に応じてそれぞれかかります。また、投資先外国籍ファンドの運用報酬については契約資産額に対して年率1.30%を上限とする料率を乗じた金額が契約期間に応じてかかります。一部の受託資産では投資一任契約に加えて成功報酬がかかる場合があります。成功報酬については、運用戦略および運用状況などによって変動するものであり、事前に料率、上限額などを表示することができません。【特定(金銭)信託の管理報酬】当該信託口座の受託銀行である信託銀行に管理報酬をお支払いいただく必要があります。具体的料率については信託銀行にご確認下さい。【組入有価証券の売買時に発生する売買委託手数料等】当該費用については、運用状況や取引量等により変動するものであり、事前に具体的な料率、金額、上限または計算方法等を示すことができません。【費用合計額】上記の費用の合計額については、運用状況などによって変動するものであり、事前に料率、上限額などを表示することができません。

20221214-2638880-JP

そのほかの投資関連情報はこちらをご覧ください。https://www.invesco.com/jp/ja/institutional/insights.html