Perspective on the bank crisis
Key takeaways
Tightening associated with crises
Federal Reserve (Fed) tightening cycles, without exception, have been associated with financial crises.
Elevated recession risk
Tightening lending standards, which has historically led to an economic downturn, is raising the likelihood of a recession.
New market cycle?
The bank failures may mark the end of market downturns and the beginning of a new market cycle, as they did in the past.
While the failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Signature Bank, and First Republic, and problems at Credit Suisse were unnerving and led to market volatility, they weren’t necessarily unexpected. Fed tightening cycles, without exception, have been associated with financial crises. Here are a few key things to keep in mind about bank crises past and present.
Most of the past crises didn’t result in systemic bank failure
Despite all the “financial accidents” that occurred across each of the Fed tightening cycles, there have only been three instances in modern US history of systemic bank failure — the 1930s, the late 1980s, and the late 2000s, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Banks appear to be healthier than during the Global Financial Crisis
The health of bank balance sheets is a fundamental difference between 2008 and today. Bank balance sheets appear to be sound as they are heavily comprised of high-quality and liquid assets, such as US Treasury bonds and cash.1 A central feature of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis was that many of the nation’s largest and most interconnected banks had levered exposure to the US housing market. Assets were worth far less than stated, and the leverage was significantly greater than had been claimed. The banks failed because of bad loans and poor credit underwriting.
But as banks tighten lending standards, recession risks are elevated
Banks were already tightening lending standards prior to the recent bank failures. It’s expected that lending standards will tighten further, which raises the likelihood of a US recession. Historically a tightening in lending standards has led to higher corporate borrowing costs as well as a downturn in US economic activity.
Banking crises may represent the beginning of new market cycles
Bank failures could potentially mark the end of market downturns and the beginning of new market cycles. That was the case in 1984 with the Continental Illinois failure as well as in the early 1990s following the Savings and Loan Crisis. The Global Financial Crisis is an outlier and represents a tail risk to an optimistic view. The 2008 crisis, however, engulfed banks with assets representing roughly 7% of the US gross domestic product (GDP). The current crisis has thus far impacted fewer and smaller banks than in 2008 and may better resemble the crises in 1984 and 1990.
Footnotes
-
1
Source: US Federal Reserve, 3/31/23.
当資料ご利用上のご注意
当資料は情報提供を目的として、インベスコ・アセット・マネジメント株式会社(以下、「当社」)のグループに属する運用プロフェッショナルが英文で作成したものであり、法令に基づく開示書類でも金融商品取引契約の締結の勧誘資料でもありません。内容には正確を期していますが、必ずしも完全性を当社が保証するものではありません。また、当資料は信頼できる情報に基づいて作成されたものですが、その情報の確実性あるいは完結性を表明するものではありません。当資料に記載されている内容は既に変更されている場合があり、また、予告なく変更される場合があります。当資料には将来の市場の見通し等に関する記述が含まれている場合がありますが、それらは資料作成時における作成者の見解であり、将来の動向や成果を保証するものではありません。また、当資料に示す見解は、インベスコの他の運用チームの見解と異なる場合があります。過去のパフォーマンスや動向は将来の収益や成果を保証するものではありません。当社の事前の承認なく、当資料の一部または全部を使用、複製、転用、配布等することを禁じます。
IM2023-028
そのほかの投資関連情報はこちらをご覧ください。https://www.invesco.com/jp/ja/institutional/insights.html