We’re seeing more nuanced debates about the downstream impact of AI, which may be important in discerning the long-term winners in this space.
A handful of emerging market companies and their underlying semiconductor technologies have been crucial to enabling generative AI solutions.
The EM world is also ripe for new waves of hardware innovation and chip design prowess that dovetail into AI products.
Season One of the artificial intelligence (AI) saga may be remembered for a rather uncomplicated storyline: Markets quickly rewarded semiconductor and hardware companies for powering AI (some deservedly, some not), particularly as the AI wave happily coincided with a cyclical bottoming of inventories in the tech supply chain. We believe Season Two is expected to feature more nuanced debates about the downstream impact of AI, which may be important in discerning the long-term winners in this space. As emerging market investors, we’re following this story closely as a handful of EM companies seek to expand their competitive edge in enabling generative AI solutions.
The use of ChatGPT has become ubiquitous, Microsoft1 has raced ahead with tools such as its Copilot “AI companion,” and IT service firms claim a rising number of AI projects. One might think businesses should see immediate value in AI adoption, but the enterprise world is so beset with disparate data, privacy and regulatory constraints, and a risk-averse outlook to seismic change, that sizeable efficiency gains may be hard to achieve.
Past technology revolutions have been driven by eager consumers, but here too, we need to see truly useful AI applications that can function on our devices. Smartphones may make a comeback if compelling use cases drive a global replacement cycle. We are seeing PC makers call some of their products “AI PCs” – do we need a new PC cycle?
In the fiscal year ended January 2023, Nvidia1 reported some $15 billion in datacenter revenues, which is where its AI business is housed.2 For the year ending January 2025, Nvidia's customers are expected to spend close to $100 billion.3 On AI chips. What will the return on investment look like as these spending plans seek revenue tailwinds?
The space is evolving rapidly, and moats may not be as wide as they appear. Therefore, optimism about future possibilities needs to be tempered with the risk of disruption. Amid these possibilities, it is clear we are heading into the great unknown.
In the EM world, a handful of companies and their underlying semiconductor technologies have been crucial to enabling generative AI solutions, including Nvidia’s datacenter graphics processing units (GPUs).
We believe the EM world is ripe with new waves of hardware innovation and design prowess that dovetail into AI products. These spaces are more complicated, but we need to keep an eye on the evolution of smartphone-related semiconductors, where MediaTek1 operates, or specific original design manufacturers who might win new business from the chip design efforts of large platforms, including the likes of Google, Meta and Amazon.1
AI’s first season ran on the theme of “see it, believe it.” Season Two is expected to be more layered and may result in wildly different outcomes for stock prices. In the face of all the hyperbole, Invesco Developing Markets Fund remains a long-term investor in highly differentiated businesses that have durability of growth, sustainable competitive advantage, strong governance (and thereby capital allocation) and a host of real options embedded in their franchises that we believe will emerge over many years.
As of March 31, 2024, Microsoft, Meta, Google, Nvidia and Amazon, represented 0% of the Invesco Developing Markets Fund. Taiwan Semiconductor manufacturing Corp., Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and Mediatek represented 9.3%, 6.4%, 0.8% and 0.2%, respectively.
Source: Nvidia Annual Report March 2023
Source to Bernstein Research May 2024
While growth has outperformed value for an extended period, signs are pointing to a potential reversal in leadership. Plus, it always makes sense to be diversified.
China’s significant policy shift is light on details, but it could be very positive for the economy. However, our bullish stance on our China holdings doesn’t depend on these policies.
Barron’s recently sat down with Kevin Holt, co-manager of the Invesco Comstock Fund, for a conversation on lessons in value investing he’s learned from more than 25 years of managing the fund.
Important information
NA3595484
Header image: Wang Yukun / Getty
There is no guarantee that forecasts will come to pass.
This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.
All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investments cannot be made directly in an index.
Holdings are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations.
The risks of investing in securities of foreign issuers, including emerging market issuers, can include fluctuations in foreign currencies, political and economic instability, and foreign taxation issues.
In general, stock values fluctuate, sometimes widely, in response to activities specific to the company as well as general market, economic and political conditions.
Capital expenditures, or capex, is the use of company funds to acquire or upgrade physical assets such as property, industrial buildings, or equipment.
Investing in securities of Chinese companies involves additional risks, including, but not limited to: the economy of China differs, often unfavorably, from the U.S. economy in such respects as structure, general development, government involvement, wealth distribution, rate of inflation, growth rate, allocation of resources and capital reinvestment, among others; the central government has historically exercised substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through administrative regulation and/or state ownership; and actions of the Chinese central and local government authorities continue to have a substantial effect on economic conditions in China.
The performance of an investment concentrated in issuers of a certain region or country, such as China and the Asia Pacific, is expected to be closely tied to conditions within that region and to be more volatile than more geographically diversified investments.
The investment techniques and risk analysis used by the portfolio managers may not produce the desired results.
Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional investments and are subject to market, interest rate, credit, leverage, counterparty, and management risks.
An investment in a derivative could lose more than the cash amount invested.
The funds listed are subject to certain other risks. Please see the current prospectus for more information regarding the risks associated with an investment in the fund.
The Fund may hold illiquid securities that it may be unable to sell at the preferred time or price and could lose its entire investment in such securities.
Growth stocks tend to be more sensitive to changes in their earnings and can be more volatile.
Stocks of small and mid-sized companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse developments, may be more volatile, ad may be illiquid or restricted as to resale.
The fund is subject to certain other risks. Please see the current prospectus for more information regarding the risks associated with an investment in the fund.
The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of 5/21/2024. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.
This link takes you to a site not affiliated with Invesco. The site is for informational purposes only. Invesco does not guarantee nor take any responsibility for any of the content.
