
Equities Three reasons why it may be a mid-cap sweet spot
A rotation to mid-cap leadership, after a long period of large-cap outperformance, is in motion with an increasingly attractive setup for 2025. Here are three reasons why we’re optimistic.
Two longtime headwinds may be turning into tailwinds for emerging market stocks: The Chinese economy and the US dollar.
We are increasingly bullish on Chinese equities. In addition to the potential for beneficial fiscal policy, China’s leadership has clearly been mending bridges to the private sector.
The US dollar’s role as the reserve currency of the global monetary system has become extremely problematic to both US policymakers and their international counterparts.
The performance of emerging market (EM) equities primarily depends on two factors, China and the US dollar (USD), both of which have been considerable headwinds for EM investors for a long period of time. However, in our view, we are likely at an inflection point that could usher in the start of another structural bull market in EM equities. Below, we detail the case for China and the case for a weaker US dollar.
The case for China hinges on the convergence of a few factors.
Chinese equities remain both significantly undervalued and deeply under-owned, in our view. We believe that foreign investors will eventually be lured back in the wake of stabilization in economic growth. Additionally, in the past five years of economic turbulence, China has accumulated over US$41 trillion of liquid bank assets with near-zero yields, which we believe will shift into higher yielding/higher growth equities.1 This implies that next pain trade in China could be very powerful and long-lasting.
The concept of “American exceptionalism” as it relates to the US equity market has been, well, truly exceptional. After a period of significant outperformance with more than 10% annualized excess returns versus EM stocks over the past three, five, and 10 years, US equities are broadly overvalued at a 40% premium versus EM equities and deeply over-owned by both international and domestic investors.2
The recent retreat in confidence in US cyclical economic growth (as evidenced by the recent moves in US long-term bond yields), elevated earnings expectations, and the uncertainty created by early Trump administration policies are unearthing broad concerns globally, reminding investors of both structural US vulnerabilities and elevated multiples. The US dollar, which appears to be overvalued on nearly all measures, is at the heart of the issue. The USD’s role as the reserve currency of the global monetary system has become extremely problematic to both US policymakers and their international counterparts.
The USD reserve currency status conveys enormous advantages including affording the US the lowest cost of capital globally, the deepest financial markets, and a dominant financial services industry. All of these have embellished the country’s relatively unique risk-taking culture and its ability to invest in the frontiers of science and engineering. The reserve currency also enables policymakers to act with relative impunity in fiscal and monetary policy, which has proven an enormous asset in mitigating the stresses of financial crises and moderating economic recessions.
However, the reserve currency also conveys considerable competitive and distributional liabilities, which have cumulated over decades. By default, the global reserve currency must provide global liquidity. This implies that the United States must run large and growing current account deficits, which were arguably more easily digested when surplus countries recycled their claims into US Treasuries. Over the past 10 years, however, the surpluses have been increasingly redirected into ownership of US real assets and, more significantly, the US stock market. This, along with concerns about fiscal sustainability in the US ($30 trillion of US fiscal debt has been added in the past quarter century3) and geopolitical tensions have been large explanatory variables of the “US exceptionalism,” where US equities hover near 70% of worldwide stock market capitalization.4
Another challenge for the USD is that the United States is broadly uncompetitive in tradeable goods, and that is unlikely to change meaningfully in the near- to medium-term. Forty years of globalization and the resulting hollowing out of US industrial capacity, along with the ascendency of the USD reserve currency, have reoriented the US workforce towards services. It will take many, many years (if we ever get there) to re-industrialize, with all requisite investments in talent, skills, and supply chains.
Ultimately, addressing the unintended consequences of the USD’s role as a reserve currency will take more than aggressive trade policy. A weaker dollar, if not a coordinated devaluation, and attempts to force economic restructuring of industrial Asia (higher domestic demand, lower savings) are requisite. These will likely be complemented by efforts to shift residual USD surpluses from portfolio investments towards direct foreign investment in the United States.
We believe that the Invesco Developing Markets fund is well-positioned for both a structural revaluation of Chinese equities and a weaker USD environment. We are increasingly bullish on Chinese equities. In addition to the potential for beneficial fiscal policy, China’s leadership has clearly been mending bridges to the private sector, which has witnessed a considerable retreat in animal spirits over the past few years. These moves will likely compound as China, like its neighbors, increasingly needs to depend on domestic rather than external demand for growth. The high-quality private companies that we own in China have been benefitting from a more disciplined competitive environment, improved capital allocation, and growing free cash flow. These include internet companies that are direct beneficiaries of the increased adoption of artificial intelligence, ones that are expected to profit from increased domestic consumption and ones that are on the cutting edge of drug development.
Outside of China, a lower USD and lower USD rates are of critical importance to reflating stubbornly low growth in Latin America, Southeast Asia, and to some extent India, where high real rates have sapped cyclical growth potential. Our holdings in these markets have suffered under the weight of a challenged macroeconomic environment and are deeply undervalued despite their attractive fundamentals. Therefore, a weaker USD could provide a tremendous catalyst for performance. Additionally, stronger currencies in Northeast Asia, which accounts for 60% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, could have positive USD return implications for EM investors.5
Source: Ceic Data, www.ceicdata.com as of January 24, 2025
Source: Bloomberg as of March 5, 2025, US stocks are represented by the S&P 500 Index. EM equities are represented by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The 3 year time period referenced is 02/28/2022 to 02/28/2025. The 5 year time period referenced is from 02/28/2020 to 02/28/2025 and the
10 time period is from 02/28/2015 to 02/28/2025. The price to earnings ratio multiple of the MSCI EM Index at 02/28/2025 is 14x and the price to earnings ratio multiple of the S&P 500 index as of Feb 28, 2025 is 24.7x.
Source: Fiscal Data, as of March 6, 2025
Source: Source: Bloomberg. US equities are represented by S&P 500 Index.
Source: MSCI Emerging Markets Index as of February 28, 2025
A rotation to mid-cap leadership, after a long period of large-cap outperformance, is in motion with an increasingly attractive setup for 2025. Here are three reasons why we’re optimistic.
Our experts address the critical questions that arose following the news of DeepSeek’s artificial intelligence model and the market’s volatile reaction.
While growth has outperformed value for an extended period, signs are pointing to a potential reversal in leadership. Plus, it always makes sense to be diversified.
Important Information:
NA4291647
Photographer Credit: ispyfriend / Getty
There is no guarantee that forecasts will come to pass.
This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.
All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investments cannot be made directly in an index.
Holdings are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations.
A pain trade occurs when a popular asset class or widely followed investing strategy takes an unexpected turn that catches most investors flat-footed. Under this definition, a sudden reversal in a niche sector or strategy would not qualify as a pain trade, since not many investors are likely to be in it.
The S&P 500® Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest domestic US stocks.
The MSCI Emerging Markets Index captures large- and mid-cap representation across 26 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 1,198 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free-float-adjusted market capitalization in each country.
A price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple, also known as a price-to-earnings ratio or earnings multiple, is a valuation ratio that compares a company's stock price to its earnings.
In general, stock values fluctuate, sometimes widely, in response to activities specific to the company as well as general market, economic and political conditions.
Growth stocks tend to be more sensitive to changes in their earnings and can be more volatile. The risks of investing in securities of foreign issuers, including emerging market issuers, can include fluctuations in foreign currencies, political and economic instability, and foreign taxation issues.
Investments focused in a particular sector, such as financials, are subject to greater risk, and are more greatly impacted by market volatility, than more diversified investments
Many products and services offered in technology-related industries are subject to rapid obsolescence, which may lower the value of the issuers.
Investing in securities of Chinese companies involves additional risks, including, but not limited to: the economy of China differs, often unfavorably, from the U.S. economy in such respects as structure, general development, government involvement, wealth distribution, rate of inflation, growth rate, allocation of resources and capital reinvestment, among others; the central government has historically exercised substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through administrative regulation and/or state ownership; and actions of the Chinese central and local government authorities continue to have a substantial effect on economic conditions in China.
The opinions expressed are those of the author and are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco investment professionals.
The investment techniques and risk analysis used by the portfolio managers may not produce the desired results.
Before investing, investors should carefully read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus and carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. For this and more complete information about the fund(s), investors should ask their financial professional for a prospectus/summary prospectus or visit Invesco.com.
This link takes you to a site not affiliated with Invesco. The site is for informational purposes only. Invesco does not guarantee nor take any responsibility for any of the content.