
Investment grade What’s driving investment grade and where might it be headed?
Investment grade bonds have had solid performance this year. Get insights about various market drivers, and where we think they may be headed.
We think the Fed has time to assess the impact of tariffs, and we expect it to wait to cut rates until the data show that tariffs are impacting the real economy.
So far, there are no signs of recession in the hard data. The tariff pause offers the possibility to avoid worst-case economic scenarios before the damage is crystalized.
We believe technical factors will continue to drive market dislocations in spreads and sectors, and that active managers can navigate this more effectively.
The April 2 “Liberation Day” tariff announcement sent stock markets reeling, as economic uncertainty intensified and recession risks rose. Invesco Fixed Income’s own assessment of the probability of recession increased after the announcement. But Treasury yields rose as well, especially longer-term yields. Normally, we would expect Treasury yields to decline in the face of uncertainty and equity volatility. The April 9 tariff pause provided some market relief, but longer-term Treasury yields are still higher than they were before the Liberation Day announcement. Why are rates behaving this way, and what does this mean for investment grade bond investors? We answer the most common questions we’re hearing from clients now.
Three main factors appear to be at play in the recent rate moves: market technicals, market fears and international sentiment. One of the drivers was likely the unwinding of a popular trade that sought to take advantage of the gap between Treasury yields and Treasury swap rates.1 Investors in this trade expected future banking sector deregulation to allow banks to demand more Treasuries, which would potentially increase Treasury prices and narrow the gap between Treasury yields and swap rates.
However, as market volatility picked up after Liberation Day, investors sought to reduce leverage in general. As investors closed out these leveraged trades, they sold Treasuries and received swaps, which drove Treasury prices lower. We believe this “unwinding” trade was partly responsible for the move in Treasury yields in the week following April 2. Our sense is that much of this unwind is over.
Market fears also likely played a role in driving Treasury rates higher — fears around foreign appetite for US Treasuries and a potential increase in the supply of Treasuries. While in the past, foreign investors have provided a large chunk of the funding for Treasuries, if the US decouples from the global financial system, domestic investors would likely be required to step in, and they may demand a higher return. Also, if the US tips into recession, government bond issuance may have to increase, putting pressure on yields.
While we don’t think we’re out of the woods, the tariff pause reduces the odds of a recession. The outlook for the Fed is unclear, but so far, it has held the line on keeping policy steady. We think the Fed has time to assess the impact of tariffs — and we think it will take it. The March labor market numbers were strong, for example. We think the Fed will wait to cut rates until it sees signs in the data that tariffs are impacting the real economy. It doesn’t seem inclined to step in to ensure the stability of financial markets, which have remained largely orderly so far. It could end quantitative tightening or signal other measures if needed, but we don’t seem to be there yet. We believe the market’s reaction to rate cuts in this environment is also uncertain — it may not interpret cuts positively.
Overall, investment grade credit has remained orderly and has performed well relative to equities and riskier fixed income.2 So far this year, interest rates have been the driver of positive returns, while credit spreads have widened. Investment grade credit spreads have widened from the low 70 basis point range late last year, to as high as 118 basis points following the tariff pause.3 To put this in historical context, the investment grade spread over Treasuries has averaged 120 basis points since 2015.4 Notably, since that time, the average credit quality of the investment grade index has improved, duration has shortened and liquidity has improved, which is why we believe spreads should be lower than the historical average.
Looking at today’s higher yields, we believe there is more value in corporate credit now, allowing more room for harvesting alpha. But if we take the case of a recession, spreads could go wider from here. Credit spreads have typically widened to 150-200 basis points over Treasuries in recessionary environments.5 As a counterpoint, we would reiterate the sound fundamental positions of corporate issuers and the reasonable levels of leverage at both the corporate and consumer levels of the economy. We’ve also seen how rapidly markets can snap back on headlines. So far, the economy is still in good shape and there are no signs of recession in the hard data. The recent pause in tariffs offers the possibility to avoid the worst-case economic scenarios before the damage is crystalized.
Prior to the new tariff policies, we were positive on the economic prospects of the US and saw strong technical demand for investment grade US bonds. However, this dynamic was balanced by tight valuations that offered less cushion in the case of a recession or risk-off event. As a result, we had already favored lower exposure to emerging markets and credit overall. However, we still think interest rates are ultimately headed lower. The market is currently pricing three rate cuts in 2025 and the potential for a fourth cut.6 If there is an economic slowdown, we believe the path for intermediate rates should be lower.
More importantly, we believe an active manager is likely to navigate more effectively and efficiently in different risk environments. We expect technical factors to continue to drive market dislocations in spreads and sectors going forward. For example, in markets in which equities are underperforming, large institutions may have to sell bonds to buy more equities to maintain their bond-to-stock ratios within the band defined by their investment policies. This type of indiscriminate or panic selling can create pockets of opportunity for active managers. In the meantime, investment grade bonds have been doing the job of bonds: Providing a high level of income while acting as ballast in portfolios and still remaining liquid.
A Treasury swap is a type of interest rate swap in which the fixed rate is tied to the yield of US Treasury securities, allowing parties to exchange interest payments based on a fixed rate against a floating rate pegged to Treasury yields.
Source: Bloomberg L.P. The year-to-date returns as of Apr. 11, 2025 were -0.05% for the Bloomberg US Credit Index and -1.42% for the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index and -8.47% for the S&P 500 Index.
Source: Bloomberg US Credit Index, Nov. 8, 2024 to Apr. 8, 2025.
Source: Bloomberg US Credit Index, Apr. 10, 2015 to Apr. 10, 2025.
Source: Bloomberg US Credit Index, Jan. 1, 2011 to Dec. 31, 2023.
Source: Bloomberg L.P., as of April 10, 2025.
Investment grade bonds have had solid performance this year. Get insights about various market drivers, and where we think they may be headed.
If our soft-landing base case plays out, our investment experts see credit and fixed income opportunities ahead and believe they may be able to achieve high single-digit yearly returns. Read why.
The future of the western spirits industry may be driven by China, the world’s largest spirits market, and India, the globe’s fastest growing major economy.
Important information
NA4415861
Image: Bloomberg Creative / Getty
Most references are US-centric and may not apply to Canada. All data is USD, unless otherwise stated.
All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Investments cannot be made directly in an index.
This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.
A basis point is one-hundredth of a percentage point.
The Bloomberg US Credit Index measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, taxable corporate and government related bond markets. It is composed of the US Corporate Index and a non-corporate component that includes foreign agencies, sovereigns, supranationals and local authorities.
The Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below.
The S&P 500® Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index of the 500 largest domestic US stocks.
Quantitative tightening (QT) or tightening is a monetary policy used by central banks to normalize balance sheets.
Fixed income investments are subject to credit risk of the issuer and the effects of changing interest rates. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise and vice versa. An issuer may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments, thereby causing its instruments to decrease in value and lowering the issuer’s credit rating.
Credit risk is the risk of default on a debt that may arise from a borrower or issuer of bonds failing to make required payments.
Credit spread is the difference in yield between bonds of similar maturity but with different credit quality.
High yield bonds, or junk bonds, involve a greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the issuer’s credit quality. The values of junk bonds fluctuate more than those of high quality bonds and can decline significantly over short time periods.
Idiosyncratic developments refer to unique events that do not affect an entire market or portfolio.
Inflation is the rate at which the general price level for goods and services is increasing.
Spread represents the difference between two values or asset returns.
The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of April 16, 2025. These comments should not be construed as recommendations but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.
This link takes you to a site not affiliated with Invesco. The site is for informational purposes only. Invesco does not guarantee nor take any responsibility for any of the content.