Tactical Asset Allocation - April 2023
Synopsis
Despite higher equity markets, a more comprehensive read of global financial markets points to tightening credit conditions and declining risk appetite in a low growth environment. We remain positioned for a contractionary environment.
Underweight risk relative to benchmark in the Global Tactical Allocation Model1, favoring fixed income over equities, developed markets over emerging markets, defensive sectors and factors. We have neutralized the overweight in developed ex-US equities relative to US equities. We favor investment grade relative to high yield, loans, and emerging market debt.
Macro update
Financial markets over the past month can be described as tumultuous and confusing, to say the least. Numerous bank failures across US regional banks and large European financial institutions have wreaked havoc in the global banking system, prompting the intervention of global central banks with emergency liquidity assistance (i.e., Federal Reserve’s Bank Funding Assistance Program), deposit guarantees and bank mergers. The swift reaction of policy makers has been critical in stabilizing market sentiment and averting a more systemic sell-fulling contagion. Somewhat surprisingly, equity markets across regions have risen over the past month closing at higher levels than when the first headlines of bank failures emerged in early March. Is this positive equity market performance indicative of a resolved problem and pointing to improving growth prospects? We don’t think so.
Looking underneath the surface, a comprehensive read of global capital markets reveals a more cautious investor landscape. Credit spreads have widened, albeit modestly, across regions and sectors, with corporate high yield and investment grade wider by approximately 40bps and 15bps, respectively, and emerging markets wider by about 30bps2. Similarly, global government bond markets have outperformed equity markets, an indication that the global equity rally was largely driven by lower discount yields rather than improving growth expectations. Consequently, our barometer of global investor risk appetite has deteriorated further over the past month which, in conjunction with leading economic indicators below their long-term average, keeps our macro framework in a contraction regime for the global economy (Figure 1 and Figure 2). While leading economic indicators have improved across regions over the past month, we believe this represents a lagged confirmation to the improving outlook we discussed at the beginning of the year (i.e., the “recovery” regime we anticipated between December 2022 – February 2023), but that has subsequently abated. We expect economic momentum to roll-over again given the deterioration in global risk appetite, tightening credit conditions and recent stresses in the banking system.
While the recent turmoil was driven by idiosyncratic bank failures, these developments should be seen as a manifestation of tighter credit conditions more broadly, and a reminder that monetary policy impacts the economy with a lag, and its effects have just started making their way into the system. As noted in several comments by Fed officials, capital markets have largely been closed in the past few weeks in terms of bond issuance, and the resulting tightening in credit conditions can be seen as equivalent or a substitute to rate hikes. We expect the Federal Reserve to end its tightening cycle soon, while the European Central Bank (ECB) will likely continue raising rates. Inflation should gradually decline, albeit not as quickly as desired. Our barometer of US inflation momentum still points to falling inflationary pressures (Figure 3).
Overall, growth remains low, and the odds of a deterioration in global growth are rising. Our asset allocation framework indicates downside risks to cyclical assets are not fully priced.
Investment positioning
We maintain a defensive positioning, with an underweight risk stance relative to benchmark in the Global Tactical Allocation Model, favoring fixed income over equities, defensive sectors and factors, and underweighting emerging market equities relative to developed markets. We underweight credit risk and overweight duration, favoring investment grade and government bonds relative to high yield, loans, and emerging market debt (Figure 4, 5, 6, 7).
In particular:
- Within equities we favor defensive factors with low operating leverage and lower exposure to economic risk such as quality and low volatility, at the expense of cyclical exposures such as value and small/mid-caps. Similarly, we favor defensive sectors such as health care, staples, utilities, and technology, at the expense of financials, industrials, materials, and energy. From a regional perspective, we continue to underweight emerging markets given the headwinds from declining risk appetite and neutralize the overweight to developed markets outside the US after holding an overweight position for the past four months. While currency valuations continue to favor non-US equities, the cyclical outperformance in European leading indicators has stalled, moving us to a neutral stance.
- In fixed income, we underweight credit risk3 and overweight duration, favoring investment grade credit and government bonds, underweighting riskier sectors such as loans, high yield, and emerging markets debt. However, income strategies remain attractive in a multi-asset context, especially relative to equities, given the higher level of real and nominal yields, and spreads at historical long-term averages. We continue to favor nominal treasuries relative to inflation-linked bonds given declining inflationary pressures.
- In currency markets we reestablish an underweight exposure to the US dollar as the US rate differential versus the rest of the world begins to decline. Within developed market currencies we favor the euro, the British pound, Norwegian kroner, and Swedish krona relative to the Swiss Franc, Japanese yen, Australian and Canadian dollars. In EM we favor high yielders with attractive valuations as the Colombian peso and Brazilian real, relative to low yielding currencies as the Korean won and Chinese renminbi.
FOOTNOTES
-
1
Benchmark is 60% MSCI All Country World Index and 40% Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index (Hedged).
-
2
Reference indices are Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index, Bloomberg US Corporate Index and Bloomberg EM USD Aggregated Index.
-
3
Credit risk measured as DTS (duration times spread).